Back to the Seven Sins -- I strongly agree with his second premise:
2. Fostering of shame, on the one hand, and hubris, on the other.
It is not easy to force people to do what they do not want to do....Children are made to feel ashamed if they perform worse than their peers and pride if they perform better....Those made to feel excessive pride from the shallow accomplishments that earn them A's and honors may become arrogant, disdainful of the common lot who don't do so well on tests; disdainful, therefore, of democratic values and processes (and this may be the worst effect of all).
While I agree that what happens to those who don't measure up is terrible, what happens to those who do is not much better. I think tracking can be useful, but it's not without it's downside. I wonder if some of these successful students don't internalize the constant competition and become somewhat fearful that they will find someone better, smarter, or more accomplished. To look at others as a constant source of competition strikes me as a barrier to healthy relationships. But I'm no pyschologist.
2 comments:
I enjoyed that article, too. Some very salient points, and I really did like his point about the system discouraging natural cooperation and mentoring, even when numerous studies show that we all learn a ton by teaching others. Just ask any homeschooling parent!
Or knitter!
One thing I love about learning knitting and crochet as an adult (learning anything, actually) is that it keeps in my mind what it's like to learn and helps me have empathy for my kids. Learning is magic and it probably happens in different ways for different people. For me, learning is not necessarily sequential and it's quite messy and then, all of a sudden, poof! I can do something I couldn't do before.
Post a Comment